Have you worked on this idea, Peter Wilson, to the point where you have some equations, numbers, maths and stuff to describe it?

If you haven't, do you expect that you will, sometime in the next three months (say)?

If you don't, perhaps you'd be kind enough to let us know how you think BAUT members could attack your idea, with glee and fervour (per the BAUT rules, ATM section)?

For example, what - in principle - could anyone present that could show your non-quantitative description is inconsistent (internally, with GR or QFT, with good observational or experimental results)?