To what extent, if any, does your idea incorporate the physics which astronomers and cosmologists use in their work?
Specifically, QED (which incorporates a quantum theory of 'light', and includes 'energy'), and GR (which differs immeasurably from Newtonian theory in most regimes).
Also, I didn't see where you answered this question of mine:
Quote:
|
[...] what - in principle - could anyone present that could show your non-quantitative description is inconsistent (internally, with GR or QFT, with good observational or experimental results)?
|
Would you care to take a stab at answering it please?