Dear Chineson:
After re-read what your wrote, I realized you are a great thinker, obvious to me, with few access to information, it also seems like your internet access is limited.
Physicists and Space Engineers have already solved the equations of the rotating object in space, for more than ... oh ... 100 years, that's how they sent people to the moon.
The motion was perplexing that great minds invented lot of good theories, you are definately one of them ............... however, the real surprise is, it's counter-intuitive, solution is complex unless you are into vector calclus.... of course, better if you have go through a PhD in Astrophysics ...... I suspect most of those that is reading your paper have something like that.
This is just a text book case of rotating object, and have been worked out.
Text books at high school level should have Newton's laws.
Text books at University level concerning gyro motion have answer for it.
Solution can be found in Libraries too, as well as internet.
Those worked out "COMPLETE" mathematical solution are showing rotation system DOES NOT work the way you precieved and decribed by "words".
Chineson: If none of those resources are available to you, Question and Answser section is a good place, please ponder a little more on what other said.. such as.
Quote:
There's two basic here, the center of mass, and the torque of the system 's center of mass.
Basically, earth-moon is a rotating rod in space, the Sun's Gravitation force does not torque ... rod's center of mass, system would not wobble.
|
Quote:
From Ken G:
1) the hypothesis does not solve the equations of motion of Newtonian mechanics, even though you claim it does (the only formula you offer does not even apply in this situation, and correct formulae will show you what really happens)
2) the hypothesis does not agree with observations
3) the hypothesis contains minor graphical errors that are no big deal but certainly don't inspire confidence.
|
Others:
Is it necessary to prolong .... ?