Dear Nereid,

You have a clear, insightful and logical mind. Your kind narrating shows the key vulnerabilities in my article. Thanks for doing so.

The weakness of my article is obvious. The deduction is too simple, though the main point of the article looks reasonable. After reading your last post, I know what the word unsubstantiated really means. And I know my article is truly unsubstantiated. You should know that English is not my mother language and this is also one of my weakness in the debating.

For your last question, it seems that I have to modify my answer. Let me close also by answering your close question:

I still hold the point that my article holds. But there would be a long way to go before making it convincing. I hope those who consider my claim reasonable can be help. I myself may not be able to present quantification deduction whatsoever, though I would try my best. I am a government official, very busy in work everyday. So I have no much time to spend on it. I hope we people could help to testify my claim, whether the result is true or not, I would be full of gratitude.

Thank you all!