View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 27-February-2006, 01:26 PM
wisp wisp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clj4
This is clearly not the case, this concept (which belongs to Ritz) has been refuted experimentally multiple times in the past 100 years. You have been given ample proof in another thread, you are simply reopening the same discussion

Have we been conned by Einstein?

using an experiment (Sagnac) this time.
Here is one of the many refutations of the 'c+-v'.

http://imaginary_nematode.home.comca...echer_1977.pdf

Here is one of the many correct explanations of the Sagnac experiment:

http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

You just opened another identical thread and you got plenty of explanations here:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=112002
Thanks for all the links clj4. But this case against relativity is as simple as it needs to be. My question of why in this limiting case, do the observers measure the speed of light as being different.
A simple explanation has not been given, because relativity fails at in this case.