View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 27-February-2006, 02:48 PM
clj4 clj4 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wisp
Thanks for all the links clj4. But this case against relativity is as simple as it needs to be. My question of why in this limiting case, do the observers measure the speed of light as being different.
A simple explanation has not been given, because relativity fails at in this case.
You have received several explanations in this thread. Since you advanced the idea that "relativity fails (in this case)" and since everyone else refuted your statement, could you, according to the rules of this forum:

1. explain your position mathematically (with formulas, not with words)
2. defend the ballistic theory that you keep advancing?
3. explain why the ballistic theory that has been proven wrong by so many experiments (see the many links and the other thread you have opened under "Have we been conned by Einstein") proves correct in the case of the Sagnac experiment?

Last edited by clj4; 01-March-2006 at 12:35 AM.