There seem to be quite a number of misunderstandings (of various theories of physics) in this idea, or perhaps misapplications.
In the OP,
RussT takes a GR equation (provided by
Tim Thompson, in a different thread), and proceeds to throw in words from popularisations of Super Gravity and M/String-Theory. No math, no equations.
Without the math, how can the idea be discussed? There are only two ways that I can see - ensure consistency in the use of terms, and phenomenology (crudely, what one could one - in principle - observe, based on this idea, that is different from what mainstream theories would predict). Here is an example:
Quote:
|
a Super Massive Black Hole in the Universe level “Above” our’s, spews 11 dimensional darkness, with “Super Gravity” leaking into and therefore embedded in the strings and membranes that make our Universe (Conservation problem solved).
|
Most, perhaps all, the terms here (SMBH, Universe, 11-dimensional darkness, leaking, embedded, strings, membranes, conservation) look familiar, but seem to be used with meanings (quite) different from the narrow, technical ones of the theory (or theories) from which they come (or, if you prefer, in which they are used).
Here is an example of a misunderstanding:
Quote:
|
To understand how I got to the universe starting as just the Darkness, just turn the clock backwards…go back in time, taking the galaxies away 365 billion every 1 billion years and shrinking the universe as you go. When you get down to about 100 (actually the 1st 100 galaxies in the universe), there is still a lot of “Space” left, and when you take the last 100 away (in 100 days, because that is how they got here)…”Space Will Not Shrink To Nothing”!
|
On the one hand, GR as a theory which has a solution, when applied to the universe, that includes expanding space-time seems to be in play; on the other, the relationship between the matter content of such a universe and its expansion has been removed (perhaps due to a misunderstanding of the GR equation?).
On phenomenology, this may be a good place to start:
Quote:
|
‘Singularities’ Make the Dark Stuff and Make the Galaxies, that ‘Singularities’ actually make the Entire Universe
|
where 'Singularities' are manifest as GRBs.
Elsewhere in this ATM section RussT has expanded on this 'GRBs create galaxies' idea. This particular claim has the advantage of at least some quantification.