View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-March-2006, 11:12 PM
JonClarke JonClarke is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,516
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
Going back to Jules Verne's scientific validity:
Remind me - wasn't his moon ship launched by - a gun?
Yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
Had no fuel?
No, it had rockets for lunar landing and take off

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
Crash landed on the Moon?
No - thrown of course by earth's second satellite

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
And found a viable ecology there?
No

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
Great science fiction, but not science.
For 1865 it was great science - give the man a break!


In fact, most of what purports to be science fiction nowadays is about as scientific, being fantasy by another name. Bring back Asimov,Clarke, Niven, and Ian M.Banks!
John[/quote]

Niven pulls more fast ones than Verne ever did and has dated a lot faster.

Jon
Reply With Quote