Quote:
|
Notice how the background matches perfectly. The foreground is different, with the flag and the astronauts and the LM in seemingly different positions. This is because the two photo's were taken from different places and at different distances. I had to rotate one of the images to get the match, so therefore I conclude that the camera was being held at an angle. If you look at the two seperate images, it looks as though Jim is leaning one way and Dave the other way. In the combined image, they are both standing upright. Notice also the angle of the LM. This suggests that the photographer was downslope when the photos were taken.
|
I'm the nutcase with the website..
here's the not-so-round earth link.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...5/20123799.jpg
With all due respect, I have a small disagreement about your 11863 and 11866 photo analysis, Johyn Witts. Someone dropped 11866 7-8 degrees and raised 11863 7-8 degrees, of course they're gonna match. Irwin (11866) should be tilted more than what he is. Its really no big deal if they did cut 'n paste the mountain and/or the astronauts just to straigten them out, it's just I can't get anyone pro-NASA to say so. Must be a pandora's box thing.
As for
http://www.clavius.org they don't mention most of the photos (if any) I have. And whoever posted that should've known before they posted.
As for those "it's so easily refuted, it's not worth responding to." posters, I get that alot. They won't respond to my questions but will go into great detail about why no blast crater or something as easy to refute. So the reason they probably don't respond is they don't know. I insinuate, but I obviously don't know. Why can't those who do know, tell those who don't? And those who do have questions, try not to be shamed into silence. I got over 330 visits inside 8 days without my site being in any search engines. Which isn't much but I'm guessing there has to be at least a few wanting to ask some questions.
Ask up, if you want.
thanks,
CraigZ