View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 07-March-2006, 02:05 PM
swansont swansont is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Washington, DC USA
Posts: 1,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wisp
Dr Alf Kelly - Chartered Engineer - seems to support my case against relativity. See
http://www.engology.com/articlerelativity.htm

No, he is not distinguishing between a curved path and a rotating system. The Sagnac delay (or advance) in timing for a light beam around the earth is not because it is travelling a circular path, it is because the earth is rotating on its axis. Dr. Kelly is mis-applying relativity, so it should be no surprise that he comes to an invalid conclusion.
__________________
"I have a cunning plan that cannot fail."
S. Baldrick