If that's what you consider an "ad hominem attack" then you need to grow a thicker skin. What journal shuold they be in? How about Fire Engineering Magazine or the journal of the American Society of Civil Engineers, to name just two, not some political economy rag. Saying "well peer review sometimes goes wrong" and trying to imply that this is the case here proves absolutely nothing. It is simply begging the question. At least one of the papers was discussed by an engineer here and found seriously wanting. Most of it appears to be the same old nonsense that's been debunked years ago, just repackaged.

These papers reveal far more about their authors than they do about events on 9-11.

__________________
I believe in karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long, and assume they deserve it.