There seems to me to be a number of different ideas in this post; would you please clarify the following?
Quote:
|
assumption made in SR with respect to the non-existance of an absolute frame
|
To what extent are you claiming that:
- 1) There is an absolute frame?
- 2) No tests have been done concerning the existance of such a frame?
- 3) The existance of such a frame is testable?
- 4) There is an alternative to SR, consistent with the relevant experimental and observational results?