Originally Posted by MacM

clj4,

You and I agree "There is no reciprocity". However, we do so for different reasons. Mine is that I hold a view where length contraction does not occur and it is against the SR relative velocity view.

You purport to support SR yet claim no recirocity. Since reciprocity is inherent in SR and it is openly stated in books and turorials on SR, I have asked you several times now to support your assertion.

I repeat once more:

"Given clocks "A" and "B" which have a relative velocity between them how do YOU determine WHICH will experience time dilation and length contraction?"

Will you be answering anytime soon? I don't mean by posting a link to discuss Dingle's mathematical errors but by stating in detail YOUR method of determining which "A" or "B" will be affected.

We are waiting.