Since no specific objection has been raised to the question I'll move on to the last question before posting the gendankin.

Do you agree that the only time dilation which can be considered an actual change in time is that which becomes recorded by accumulation of time on a clock when compared in the same frame as the rest clock?

That is certain illusions of perception due to motion of the observer do not constitute actual change in time. To be a change in time then the twin must physically be younger when compared back together.