I have no intention whatever of doing that because all these questions I answered in prior posts. I am not a parrot. Can you not be lazy? For cosmology very important is the CMB Angular Spectrum. I described it in my last posts in details. It is consistent with the results obtained by WMAP. It means that whole my theory is correct, also the Titius-Bode law. In my posts I many times cited the references connected with the observational facts and experimental data which support that my theory is correct. I also cited the references which prove that the mainstream theories are incorrect. For example the LCDM is unable to explain the values for the smallest and greatest multipole moments because this theory is able only to fit the theoretical values to the observational facts for smooth curve applying many spherical harmonics and amplitudes without explanation of physical meaning of them. It is a childish game.

My theory is able explain every problem and I proved it many times making calculations in this thread. Accuracy of obtained results is better than the obtained within the mainstream theories. Most important is fact that in my theory each physical quantity has physical meaning. In the mainstream theories dominates mathematics because authors of them do not understand PHYSICS as a whole.

One more example: as I said before, from the matter frown out by the typical black holes just after the Big Bang were created H, He, O, Fe, Pu(244) (because of the four-neutrino supersymmetry). In the biggest distances of the centers of cosmic structures, in the coldest regions, should be created Fe lumps, BUT ALSO WATER and ICE LUMPS (because there was H and O). In the very high temperature some part of Fe(56) should be transformed into Si(28) (because of the symmetrical decays). And it is consistent with observational facts (we can see it also in the Kuiper belt and Oort cloud)! We know that in the meteors there dominate Fe, ice, Si and O!!!!!! It is the cold baryonic matter.

In my theory all is so simple because it is correct theory.
If the all my posts it is too little to convince you that my theory is correct then in my opinion it means that you are a fanatic of the stupid mainstream theories and it means that next million evidences also do not convince you that my theory is correct. It means that I must end my discussion with you because this discussion is not sensible. It is pity that stupidity does not hurt because then discussion would be more honest.