View Single Post
  #1247 (permalink)  
Old 06-April-2006, 07:25 PM
dgruss23's Avatar
dgruss23 dgruss23 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 4,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid
Oops - I simply started at the bottom of Bill's publication page (the one I provided a link to in my post #1194), but didn't check (they are, as you note, meeting abstracts).

If you start at the top of the page, and select likely looking papers by their titles ... (you have >100 to choose from).

For example, there are four papers with the title "Seeing Galaxies Through Thick and Thin {n}"

Some others that might be helpful:

91. Deep HST Galaxy and Pair Counts as Constraints on Merging History, Wentao Wu and William C. Keel, AJ 116, 1513 (1998). ( ADS | e-AJ)

88. Gravitational Interactions and Ram-Pressure Stripping in Poor Groups, David S. Davis, William C. Keel, John S. Mulchaey, and Patricia A. Henning AJ 114, 613 (1997). ( ADS)

83. Rotation Curves and Velocity Measures for Spiral Galaxies in Pairs, Astrophys. J. Supplement 106, 27 (1996). ( ADS)

73. Mass Transfer and Star Formation in the Early-Type Galaxy of a Mixed Pair, AM 0327-285, D.F. de Mello, W.C. Keel, J.W. Sulentic, R. Rampazzo, E. Bica, & R.E. White III, Astron. Astrophys. 297, 331 (1995). ( ADS)
I'd like to hear your thoughts as to the relevance of these papers to the bridges discussion. Specifically, I'm wondering in what ways these papers (1) add support to the mainstream position that the NGC 7603 and other Arp et al cases are not actual interacting systems or (2) add support to the Arp et al case that the the systems are interacting or (3) are these papers a non-factor in this discussion.
__________________
"The scientist who asks the right question reconnoiters a new patch of the unknown, and may, with luck, bring it within the constricted but expanding boundaries of the known."

~Timothy Ferris (The Red Limit) 1982