Thanks for your interest and I feel bad that not very many BAUTs have expressed an opinion on my EEP thread. Like I said, it is a work in process and I need assistance.

The existence and characteristics of the elementary energy wave/particle (EEP) is crucial to my theory of how the entropy problem is solved in the greater universe.

EEP interactions (pre-quantum environments) are predominant during the formation of an ultimate black hole. As I said, we are not talking about a micro black hole, or a collapsed star, or even a black hole at the center of a galaxy; we are talking about an ultimate black hole (UBH) of proportions large enough to contain the “stuff” of our entire known universe.

EEP interactions (pre-quantum environments) are also predominant immediately after the big bang that is sparked by a UBH.

But unless you are in the vicinity of a black hole (especially one that is in the process of becoming a UBH), or unless you find yourself in the hot expansion of a big bang, EEP interactions are relegated to the quantum framework of the universe (interaction of quantum and atomic particles) and the progression of nucleosynthesis. In other words, at all other times EEP environments have stabilized and stable EEP environments form quantum particles which make up atomic particles, therefore quantum and atomic environments have become predominant.

Though EEPs influence all particle interaction, the real work of the EEP takes place between the event horizon of an ultimate black hole and the minutes immediately following a big bang.

Before I post my thoughts about what makes a big bang go “bang”, I would like to get a better understand of reference frames so that I can use the right language.

Is it proper to say that the universe exists in one potentially infinite reference frame, but within it, it is possible for different (individual) reference frames to exist?

Is it proper to say that any individual reference frame, when viewed from the universal reference frame, will appear different to an observer in the universal reference frame than it appears to an observer in that particular reference frame if that particular reference frame is accelerating relative to the universal reference frame?

Would it be correct that the apparent difference would be the effect of general relativity?

From the universal reference frame, is it correct that an individual reference frame that is accelerating will appear to be getting more massive as it accelerates and it will appear that time is passing slower and slower as it accelerates, while from within the accelerating reference frame everything will seem normal?

Now if acceleration of the particular reference frame stops, but it is now traveling fast relative to the universal reference frame:

When acceleration of the particular accelerating reference frame stops, but that particular reference frame is traveling at some particular speed (high speed) relative to the universal reference frame, is there still an apparent difference in mass and time based on which reference frame you are viewing from?

In that situation, would the mass of the speeding reference frame still appear to be greater (but no longer increasing) when viewed from the universal reference frame than it appears to be when viewed from a perspective within the speeding reference frame? Would time now be moving at the same pace in both reference frames because there is no more acceleration? Would a clock in the speeding reference frame be running consistently behind (but at the same pace) relative to a clock in the universal reference frame, assuming that both clocks were in sync before the speeding reference frame began its acceleration and assuming that the acceleration of the speeding reference frame as stopped relative to the universal reference frame?