View Single Post
  #228 (permalink)  
Old 20-April-2006, 08:36 PM
SolusLupus's Avatar
SolusLupus SolusLupus is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 5,055
Send a message via AIM to SolusLupus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antoniseb
This page didn't say anything about the placement of the third bullet, or the umbrella man that seems to have pumped his umbrella up and down just before the shooting. Do you have some things to clear that up?
Does no one check out the site I linked to??

http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100tum.html

From http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100menu.html

As far as I can see, there is no viable reason to think there was any conspiracy at all. All the evidence I've ever seen has more pointed towards people being able to make a conspiracy theory based on ignorance more than anything else. You have to be pretty familiar with the assassination to know all the facts surrounding it; but once you know the facts, the conspiracy theory seems rather strange and ignorant.

Edit: I'll also add that I talked to an expert on firearms and ammunition, and he saw nothing wrong with the "single bullet theory". He says that, yes, bullets can do that. He's about as much an expert I'd call anyone an expert, even if he doesn't have any license that claims him as one. I'd stand by any of the statements he makes when it comes to... well, almost anything, but especially anything remotely related to firearms, whether in development or already developed.

Saying, "It's strange, thus it should make us question the scenario" is to basically say, "It's strange to me..." And if you aren't an expert on firearms, that really doesn't matter much.
__________________
There are few left who
Stare at the skies with wonder
Wishing to know more;
The clouds still drift by above
But the eyes below are blind.

--Laura Lundberg

Check out my writing, maybe.