Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
The Parkland doctors, as I said, all agreed that the throat wound was an entry wound. And the doctors and all others present at the autopsy were unanimous (despite Dr. Humes only willing to state that probing was "difficult") that the back wound was a shallow entry wound, only a few inches deep when probed, and had no exit point.
|
Mr. Turbonium,
Since the trajectory of the bullet through Kennedy’s back and neck was slightly downward, for that trajectory to have come from the front, that would have required a gun firing from inside the limousine from the level of Governor Connally’s back, and the Zapruder film shows no gun inside the limousine.
For one shot to go into Kennedy’s back at the same time another separate bullet went into Connally’s back, would have required two shooters from the same window of the TSBD.
For the shot into Connally’s back to not go through Kennedy and to produce an oblong wound in Connally’s back would have required a bullet to be fired from the book depository and travel sideways all the way to Connally’s back.
Didn’t you state earlier that some doctor claimed the bullet that hit Kennedy in the back didn’t go all the way through? And now you say that the neck wound was a front entrance wound? So he was hit by two bullets going in exactly the opposite directions at the same time, one hitting from the front and another hitting from the back?
You can’t take brief initial observations and opinions from several different witnesses and try to solve a case with that information while assuming it is all correct. Garrison did that and that’s how he wound up with 3 foreign guns coming out of the Book Depository (two were actually initial misidentifications by eyewitnesses) and 7 shooters in Dealey Plaza (taken from various witnesses who heard echoes of the shots coming from different directions).
While you are quoting only some of the initial testimony that you want to quote, professional researchers and investigators have studied the whole case and have worked out what actually happened and the reason why some of the initial eyewitness testimony was not correct.
After drilling its way through Kennedy’s back and out his neck, the Carcano bullet left a small exit wound that could have easily been mistaken for an entrance wound during the quick observations before the tracheotomy, since the Parkland doctors were not familiar with Carcano wounds. It would have been quite different had a group of WW II American doctors, who were familiar with Carcano wounds, been working in Parkland that day.