Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
Where has it been established that two separate bullets would need to hit both JFK and Connally at precisely the same time?
|
Well, since the Zapruder film clearly establishes that Kennedy reacts
once (and then is shot in the head, producing a different reaction), and that Connally reacts so quickly that it
supports the SBT (despite what Garrison, ye gods, wants you to think), yes, in fact, the bullets would have to be fired simultaneously.
Quote:
|
Why do you claim that both wounds had to be from two bullets hitting JFK "in exactly the opposite directions at the same time"?
|
A combination of the reactions seen on the Zapruder film and . . . er . . . what, exactly, do you think happened? In short, we're applying basic physics and ballistics. What are you doing?
Quote:
|
Unfounded SBT claim once again - why insist a single bullet entered the back and exited the throat when it's well established that it didn't?
|
Well-established by whom? By the people you keep insisting didn't know what they were doing? By Garrison, ye gods? And are you yet willing to concede the whole "Connally was in a jump seat and they weren't sitting still and facing forward" thing, or are you going with a bullet jumping around despite all the physical evidence to the contrary?