Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nereid
How?
I mean, how does it 'make perfect sense'?
In your answer, please be sure to provide OOM estimates, or state clearly that you have no quantitative basis for your claim.What does this mean?
I mean, the statement itself is pretty unambiguous ("most efficient" means, among other things, "there is no other mechanism, known to early 21st century Homo sapiens or not yet so known, that is more efficient").
What is the efficiency coefficient? How was such efficiency determined? measured?
In terms of the 'homopolar motor', what are the parameters which characterise NGC 4696's homopolar motor? (I guess, this being an EU thread, that they involve things like charges, currents, magnetic fields, and so on)What are those 'hallmarks'? How many of them are there? (be sure that you have listed "all" in your reply) What is the duration of this 'electrical event'?
|
If you were to try and transport matter any distance what would be the best way? This usually implies the most efficient.
Maybe my misunderstanding but the article stated they saw NGC 4696 in X-Ray, Radio and UV and I just assumed that meant most other frequencies as well, while in fact it is true that the article did not in fact mention ELECTRICITY well..., my bad for just assuming without first seeing the OOM and quantative hypotheses, that these observed frequencies would require, obviously, vast amounts of electrical power, a few OOM above that which is observed within the solar system.
But if it was a black hole, Where does all that matter end up?
The duration could be, on our time scale as Homo Sapiens, Aeons.
Sorry unable to provide peer reviewed OOM's at this point in time.
Sol