Alright, I guess I'm going to have to find time to read that thing then. A link would have been nice though.
Here is the page I use for original research, at history-matters.com, as it has scans of all the original pages, rather than converted-to-text versions, many of which contain typos.
Why is it nobody is ever wrong if they agree with you though? The doctors who actually saw the neck wound later said it could have been an exit wound but you insist that they are wrong and their initial opinion was right even though they disagreed later.
Because, like most conspiracists, he has to cherry-pick the evidence, and add, delete or move data points as needed, in order to attempt to make the evidence fit a conspiracy theory. Except
turbonium doesn't seem even to
have a theory; just a collection of vague suspicions and innuendo.
Pathologists don't just look at the body and figure out what happened. They use outside information too. Such as when determining time of death. A coroner is not going to render a report that sets a time of death when the police report says the victim was seen at a mall during that time, unless they are absolutely sure. They use all available information and then give their best estimate. So it's not out of line for the commision to furnish information which makes it easier for them to render an opinion.
As we've seen in the S911T thread, conspiracists begin with a conclusion and work backwards in an attempt to find facts that support, or appear to support, that conclusion. Therefore, any facts that do not support the conclusion must be explained away in some manner; generally by handwaving, or else by pointing out anomalies that inevitably exist in any legitimate evidence and claiming those anomalies invalidate the evidence.
...the depository, where he worked, was the only no deflection angle in the plaza and from the top floor, it did line up Kennedy and Conally quit nicely.
Have you seen Dale Myers'
computer simulation that was featured on the ABC special a couple of years ago? It's outstanding. Most conspiracists dismiss it out of hand, of course, as it proves the Single Bullet Theory, which destroys many conspiracy theories. These conspiracists conveniently ignore or attempt to handwave away the fact that ABC News hired a leading forensic computer modeling firm to independently evaluate Myers' work, and the company gave the simulation a
sterling review.
Although I disagree that the limo slowed down. It was already going pretty slow, not that it mattered since it was heading directly away from Oswald.
Evidence that the limo slowed down is mixed--two of the motorcycle officers escorting it seemed to believe so; they would presumably have had reason to know. Agent Greer, the driver, testified that he was looking around to see what had happened after he heard someone react to being shot--it stands to reason that he might have unconsciously braked while doing so. I'm planning to buy Myers' DVD of his animation--I'm hoping that will provide some evidence on this point.
I tend to agree with you, though, that it didn't matter whether Greer slowed down or maintained speed--the important point is that he didn't immediately speed up or take other evasive action, either of which might well have saved Kennedy's life.