Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VanderL
Why do you give an opinion before looking at it in detail?
Bell et al. show that the total redshift distribution shows a peak at z=0.7 (just like Tang et al did) and subtract the smoothed distribution from the raw data (the reverse of a selection bias is also a "bane of an astronomer's life"). The resulting peaks are strongly supporting Bell's (and Burbidge's) equation that was beased on a specific example of 14 QSO's around NGC 1068.
Btw, shouldn't this be discussed in the Arp et al. thread?
Cheers.
|
Before proceeding to challenge your claims here VanderL, I would like to hear whether you will be defending these or not.
In particular, your assertion that "
The resulting peaks are strongly supporting Bell's (and Burbidge's) equation that was beased on a specific example of 14 QSO's around NGC 1068." (my bold)