Originally Posted by turbo-1

I had not made an appearance here for a reason, although I find it interesting that you call me out on this thread. I find the arguments for quantized redshifts interesting, but not compelling, and I'm not prepared to defend them from a gleeful and vigorous attack at this point. I am prepared to gleefully and vigorously defend bridges as evidence for interaction between objects of discordant redshifts, as are many of us. Unfortunately, the "More from Arp et al" thread is almost entirely bereft of mainstreamers, and has been for over a month. I think your last post was in early April. We may eventually get to a discussion of redshift quantization, but I doubt that it will be soon. We have lots better fish to fry.

Originally Posted by Nereid

As dgruss23 (in the Arp et al. thread), and Tim Thompson (in several threads), have pointed out, it takes considerable time and effort present good cases, and good challenges - one can really only challenge an idea well if one first understands what it is.