Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nereid
It may well be that the Bell & McDiarmid paper reports a powerful statistical analysis ... is any BAUT member prepared to make that case?
|
Why should any BAUT member make such a case? Isn't the paper it's own case? Doesn't any paper published have to stand up to scrutiny? Why don't you just tell us where the paper is wrong and if and why their comments on the Tang and Zhang conclusions are faulty. If no one is able to refute the Bell & McDiarmid paper, shouldn't we then just conclude that there is support for redshift periodicity and Bell's model?
Cheers.