I disagree
So what value would a reconstruction and crash investigation by the NTSB be anyways, if you have just admited you don't agree with them over TWA-800, why should this be different with AA-77?
edited:
I thought I might just add a bit to this. Really Turbonium you are getting way out of the top of reality here. Perhaps you should actually read your own arguments back to yourself and realise how ridiclous you are being. Get real. Here you are demanding to have an evidence presented that you already know, and have basically admitted, that you wouldn't accept as valid anyway even if it was, and on top of that you don't even seem to know if what you were demanding has been done anyway because you contradicted yourself about it. Do you realise just how dumb and desperate that sounds? To start out you actually sounded like you could be reasonable, but now you've shown that you have your head jammed too far into your own reality and are so closed to the real world that nothing will enter your ears. All the learning you could have taken onboard here and elsewhere just washes over you like water poured on oiled leather. You have just cherrypick and google out of context quotes to made up your own pretty little reality where everything is a big bad conspiracy and then fight like to tiger so you can remain ignorant about anything and everything else. Well since that's the way you want life, good luck. It's a sad way to live but it's your choice. Perhaps one day you'll realise the error of your ways, but as long as you stick your fingers in your ears and blindly charge on in your own little world.....
|