View Single Post
  #406 (permalink)  
Old 24-May-2006, 02:53 AM
turbonium turbonium is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 378
Default

What's saddest of all is that so many are willing to accept the story that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon without worrying about insignificant details like actual proof.

Your standards for satisfactory evidence seem to consist primarily of providing links to photos of a small piece of crumpled up metal or whatever and saying "See - there's the undeniable proof!" That's laughable, frankly.

These aircraft are built to mil-std. specs. That means an aircraft assembled with thousands of parts, each stamped with a unique identifying number which can be traced back to the exact aircraft to which they belong. It is simply impossibile for a Boeing 757 to crash into the Pentagon and not be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt from the debris.

They have failed to show that they have any such evidence for over five years now.

I refuse to accept that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon simply because they say it did. Why do most of the others here accept it without verifiable, conclusive proof? I honestly can't understand why.
Reply With Quote