Typical CT rhetoric. Demand proof you won't accept anyway, after all what would have stopped the "conspriators" just stamping the right numbers on fake pieces? You're just moving the goal posts like every other time. You're not interested in get to the truth, you're only interesting in demanding that "one more little peice of evidence I need to have it proved" so you can carry on believing in your little CT world rather than facing up to reality.

That's just a favorite straw man argument, PW - instead of accepting the request for proof as reasonable at face value, tag me as a "typical CT" that wouldn't accept it as genuine by claiming they are still fake parts.

First of all, it's not as if you can just take a few days and crank out authentic looking duplicates for all of the many thousands of parts and assemblies in a 757. Pulling that off would take a master stroke of workmanship, time and dedication - I would certainly not go so far as to still believe it was faked to such a minute degree.

Asking for solid, conclusive evidence is in no way whatsoever a case of "moving the goalposts"! That's the easy way out, by trying to twist it around into nothing but a "CT tactic". It doesn't wash. Not trying to be preachy, but demanding proof for an unproven claim stands by itself as the inherent right of every citizen to demand from his or her elected representative.

To steal Jay's favourite phrase, Hogwash. No one here accepts the offical story because that's what we have been told to believe and you know that. I and the others here have looked at the evidence that -IS- in the public arena and compared it to the offical story, rather then doing the standard CT trick and ignoring it or making up reasons it might have been faked. The Eyewittness reports of the crash, the wittness reports of the recovery, the wreakage recovered, the damage to the building, the radar track, the location of the recovered black boxes, the coroner reports on the DNA from the recovered body parts, the damage to objects and items on the flight path such as the lamp posts, trees, fence and generator. All of that evidence says one thing, a 757 hit the Pentagon. To claim anything else means the burden of proof is on you to show that that evidence was made up or planted, it doesn't just disappear because you want "just one more little piece."

The problem is you tend to accept most or all of these things outright as iron-clad "evidence" without ever questioning them - even on a single issue. Anything left out or not revealed prompts a knee-jerk response that it is all "irrelevant" if it hasn't been disclosed, or it is classified "in our best interests" or "for reasons of national security". All those are gestures of implicit trust in our gov't that if it isn't disclosed they are doing so for our benefit.

Let's hear all the black box recordings and ATC tapes (if any still exist that weren't destroyed against regulations already). Let's see all the airport surveillance videos of the "hijackers" checking in - they have not released even one from that day! And let's see the evidence for Flt. 77 - the actual, concrete evidence that proves the story. We pay them to represent our best interests and they are supposed to be working for [i]us[/u], not the other way around.