Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
Not trying to be preachy, but demanding proof for an unproven claim stands by itself as the inherent right of every citizen to demand from his or her elected representative.
|
Only if you consider the claim unproven. It absolutely boggles the mind that there are still people who do, despite the enormous amounts of evidence that, you know, a BIG FRICKIN' PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON! I mean, let's list the evidence, shall we?
Eyewitnesses. While not infallible, if you have lots and lots of them that all attest to having seen the same thing, that kind of helps indicate that they're probably right.
Plane bits.
Admittedly fuzzy video.
A big, plane-shaped hole.
Identified remains of people who were on the plane in question.
A plane that disappeared from radar into the Pentagon.
A plane that never reappeared anywhere else.
Lots of missing people who were on the plane.
Damage leading up to the Pentagon that indicates a big frickin' plane.
The conclusion of lots and lots of structural engineers that what we saw is what is likely to happen if a big frickin' plane hit the Pentagon.
I'm sure I'm missing evidence. Now, I have a direct question for you--two of 'em, in fact. Can you refute every single piece of this evidence (and if so, how), and can you provide any concrete evidence--motive is not concrete evidence--that anything happened
other than a Big Frickin' Plane hitting the Pentagon? I want details and citations, please, though I don't require that the citations be from websites. Documents are also acceptable.