Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
What's saddest of all is that so many are willing to accept the story that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon without worrying about insignificant details like actual proof.
Your standards for satisfactory evidence seem to consist primarily of providing links to photos of a small piece of crumpled up metal or whatever and saying "See - there's the undeniable proof!" That's laughable, frankly.
These aircraft are built to mil-std. specs. That means an aircraft assembled with thousands of parts, each stamped with a unique identifying number which can be traced back to the exact aircraft to which they belong. It is simply impossibile for a Boeing 757 to crash into the Pentagon and not be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt from the debris.
They have failed to show that they have any such evidence for over five years now.
I refuse to accept that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon simply because they say it did. Why do most of the others here accept it without verifiable, conclusive proof? I honestly can't understand why.
|
I have to say that I most strongly agree with Turbonium on this.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jt-3d
On this we can agree however I'm sure enough serial numbers have been checked to satisfy me. And I'm sure no amount of checking would satisfy you.
|
So on the basis of what evidence are you sure enough to be satisfied? Would you mind sharing that with us?
Oh, I know... you would, because you already know that it's not going to satisfy either Turbonium or me.
And how do you know that?