View Single Post
  #427 (permalink)  
Old 24-May-2006, 09:46 AM
Brumsen's Avatar
Brumsen Brumsen is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbonium
What's saddest of all is that so many are willing to accept the story that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon without worrying about insignificant details like actual proof.

Your standards for satisfactory evidence seem to consist primarily of providing links to photos of a small piece of crumpled up metal or whatever and saying "See - there's the undeniable proof!" That's laughable, frankly.

These aircraft are built to mil-std. specs. That means an aircraft assembled with thousands of parts, each stamped with a unique identifying number which can be traced back to the exact aircraft to which they belong. It is simply impossibile for a Boeing 757 to crash into the Pentagon and not be able to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt from the debris.

They have failed to show that they have any such evidence for over five years now.

I refuse to accept that a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon simply because they say it did. Why do most of the others here accept it without verifiable, conclusive proof? I honestly can't understand why.
I have to say that I most strongly agree with Turbonium on this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt-3d
On this we can agree however I'm sure enough serial numbers have been checked to satisfy me. And I'm sure no amount of checking would satisfy you.
So on the basis of what evidence are you sure enough to be satisfied? Would you mind sharing that with us?
Oh, I know... you would, because you already know that it's not going to satisfy either Turbonium or me.
And how do you know that?
Reply With Quote