I'm reading the
NIST report (45 page pdf) on the damage to the Pentagon. I don't see how what is described there can be caused by a missile.
Page 20 (pdf: printed number = page 28):
Quote:
|
... aligning gashes that seem to indicate impact by the right wing of the aircraft
|
Same page:
Quote:
|
Most of the serious structural damage was within a swath that was apporximately 75 to 80 ft wide and extended approximately 230 ft into the first floor of the building.
|
Page 23 (printed page 34):
Quote:
|
Most first-floor columns outside of the direct path of the moving debris had no visible damage or had light cracking and spalling, most probably caused by fire.
|
So something created a path of destruction 75 to 80 ft wide, with the parts of the building outside of it sustaining much less damage: that looks to me as if a plane crashed through it, causing heavy destruction, and the explosion that followed creating much less destruction.
With a missile, the path from the "plane" (missile) would be much smaller, and the damage by explosion takes another form (and would normally be bigger, but that depends on the power of the explosive of course).