Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pghnative (paraphrasing others)
Their apparant theory is that on September 11, three planes were hijacked and crashed into WTC1, WTC2 and a Pennsylvania field. And a fourth airplane was hijacked, but not crashed into the Pentagon. Instead, a missile was fired into the Pentagon, the plane crashed somewhere else, and then parts (plane and people) were planted at the Pentagon.
In what universe is this a more likely scenario than simply crashing the fourth plane into the Pentagon???????
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
In what universe is this a more likely scenario than simply crashing the fourth plane into the Pentagon???????
It's more likely based on the limited physical damage to the Pentagon and the lack of debris that proves a 757 hit it.
|
This exchange convinces me that
turbonium is not arguing in good faith. I am convinced that he/she knows very well that no perpetrator (US, Arab, other) would hijack four planes, crash three of them into targets, but then divert the fourth while hitting its target with a missile. To claim otherwise is asinine.