Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbonium
Timeout!
It's painfully obvious from some of the posts here that many of you have no idea of what it's like to be in the minority opinion on a forum!
Just to fill you in - there are multiple questions being fired at you from numerous people, often within minutes of each other.
Not addressing each and every single point, or follow-up point to something I have addressed, is not only common, but next to unavoidable.
Until the day I, like the other minority voices amongst a majority fora, am able to make several clones to divvy up the workload, you'll be a lot better off if you stop thinking your posts are being deliberately ignored in whole or in part, when they have simply been overlooked or I have not been able to return to a post six pages back at the same time as another reply is being written. Or if they lack an immediate response.
Or, try it out for yourself somewhere. You'll get what I mean in no time.
|
No, turbonium. The evidence that you deliberately ignored a large number of highly problematic questions in the JFK thread after your "case" for a conspiracy had been totally demolished is incontrovertible. After I repeatedly requested that you refrain from arguing about peripheral issues and address the many direct questions that had been posed to you, you simply stopped posting in the thread. Your last post there was two weeks ago. So it is quite frankly extremely disingenuous of you to imply that your failure to answer questions in this thread is merely due to your being overworked.
__________________
--Doug
"When your statics problem becomes a dynamics problem, you're in trouble." --me
Moor's Law: "As you go from freshman engineering to Ph.D., the amount of work required per credit hour doubles approximately every 18 months." --me, inspired by Prof. Scott Moor
|