Many of which had been asked multiple times over the course of a number of days, giving plenty of time to respond. Many of which were also asked before posts you've chosen to respond to...

Please point out the many questions asked multiple times over several days to me which I have failed to address.

I understand the issue, but it seems more obvious that this is a case of "completely avoid the points you can't address and respond to the ones you can handwave away."

Why do I think this? You've made statements about the damage to the Pentagon and the street lights, both well after I've posted evidence that proves those statements to be amazingly weak, and both in response to posts following mine. Meaning? You've apparently seen those points and decided to ignore them.

You know, rather than waste time by making all sorts of assumptions about me, all it really takes is a simple "turbonium, could you please answer the questions I asked you in post #__ ?" Or if I missed answering one or more of the questions in a particular post, just say "turbonium, could you please answer the question about _____ that you missed in post # ___?"

It gets right to the point, and makes the thread move along a lot smoother.

Not so difficult, is it?

Edit to add: PeterB is very good at doing this - he refers back to a post# that was addressed to me but I hadn't responded to. I appreciate this method of debate. He seems to understand that there are times when sheer volume of material makes an oversight occur. And then I am more than happy to say "Sorry, Peter, I will reply in my following post." And I then make a priority of answering it.