THE BIRTH OF A GALAXY

Please click first.
http://www.narrabri.atnf.csiro.au/pu...mages/ngc2915/

In the standard model, galaxy formation is thought to be either “bottom up” or “top down”. The timeline for this formation through the merging of proto-galaxies, in the far universe, is being pushed farther and farther back, closer to the Big Bang, while in the last 20 or so years, younger and younger galaxies have been found nearby. Because of this, galaxy formation has become even more of a mystery, and remains, one of the biggest questions in cosmology today.

A tremendous amount of very hard work has been done modeling all the different aspects of how Einsteins General Relativity can fit the good observational evidence of just how our universe works, and is well trusted, as well it should be.
I once made the statement that E=MC^2 will become far more famous than it already is, and now I am extending that, to include all of GR, and the following
will certainly test mainstreams actual level of trust in it. A lot of the very hard work that has been done in GR, is the modeling of the ‘singularity’, the proposed Friedmann “naked” singularity (Big Bang Singularity) and the black holes and the ‘singularities’ that reside in them. Keep in mind here, that all the math has already
been done, in all the modeling of the different parts of what I am going to show. All I am doing, is showing how the different parts of the puzzle fit together, to form a coherent picture of precisely what is happening to cause the Birth Of a Galaxy

It is now well established that a Super Massive Black Hole (SMBH) exists in the center of all regular galaxies, and that these SMBH’s are rotating, so would therefore be Kerr Rotating Black Holes, which would then mean that they would have “Ring” shaped singularities somewhere in the depths of the black hole.

So, what would be wrong with the concept that the “Singularity” inside the SMBH is responsible for actually making the galaxy that it is in?

Intrigued? As well you should be! Because the answer is that there is absolutely nothing wrong with this concept, considering the fact that this is the only place where we really know there are singularities (other than the stellar ones)!

So, here is precisely how a Galaxy is born.

Considering a Kerr SMBH in the center of a galaxy
From this site;http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/BHfaq.html#q10

I believe that most people see this as the most correct configuration,
black hole/ring singularity/worm hole/white hole, and as such, since the Baryonic Matter has gone through the black hole and the singularity, the Matter has been spaghettified, so the white hole could not be spewing Baryonic Matter.

So, realizing that many people have also read/heard about this second White Hole solution, when ever anyone would suggest that White Holes spewed Baryonic Matter I would of course try to explain that the other White Hole was the correct one, and that White Holes don’t spew Baryonic Matter once the Matter has gone through the black hole.

Then, one night, a couple of weeks ago, after reading a response on the forum about singularities…

It finally dawned on me, that the time reversed solution, was actually the
Time frame before the singularity was in the black hole, and that it actually was spewing what would become Baryonic Matter…it had just been “miss named”, it wasn’t really a White Hole at all…it was a

NAKED SINGULARITY


Now, this makes much more sense, since it has always bothered me that there
were 2 solutions for the white hole, which just made it seem like there was something wrong. What is absolutely incredible to me though, is that for over a year I have been saying, “that the only thing powerful enough to make a SMBH is a Naked Singularity”, and yet every time someone would suggest that “White Holes” spewed Baryonic matter, I would say…no they can’t as per the explanation above. This is absolutely a supreme example of how our definition of words affects our concepts!

So, now what do you think of the concept that the singularity in the black hole at the center of galaxies is responsible for making that galaxy? Like I said, it is the only place where we are ‘Relatively’ sure (pun intended) that Singularities exist (except the stellar ones). When you think about it, this is the simplest solution, and I won’t go into all the unanswered questions of how SMBH’s are made or the problems of galaxy formation, they are all well known.

Now, what would be the good observational evidences when this would occur? First, we would see (now that we can) a very bright light (the singularity starting that galaxies life) that could be seen, randomly across the sky, from clear across the universe, and after that light cooled enough to fade completely, what would we expect to see?

This is precisely what we would see!

http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=2896

The “First Dark Matter Galaxy Found” is a galaxy of Hydrogen I spinning just like a galaxy is supposed to because of the black hole at it’s center, and this stays dark (comparable to the dark era) for somewhere around 3 to 5 hundred thousand years or longer, before the black hole has gathered it back enough to start the star making process. Then it may take several millions of years for it to start making enough stars for us to see it. When we could see it, what would we expect to see? This is precisely what we would see.

http://www.narrabri.atnf.csiro.au/pu...mages/ngc2915/

The Ghost Galaxy is a perfect example for revealing how galaxies evolve from the Dark Matter galaxy, to almost first starlight (we need to keep looking at fainter and fainter LSB’s to see ‘first starlight’). Notice that the Ghost galaxy is classified as a Blue Compact Dwarf Galaxy (BCD), but it is obviously going to evolve into a Spiral Galaxy. In fact, if you look at the picture again, you can even see where the “Bar” and the “Bulge” are going to be. It is also quite evident that the black hole has spun the H I into it’s spiral formation before stars have even been formed there.

So, quite simply, the Dark Matter Galaxies evolve into Low Surface Bright Galaxies (LSB’s) and BCD’s, which evolve into the High Surface Bright Galaxies (HSB’s) we have all come to know and love. Note; Obviously, some of the ‘red’ LSB’s may be very old and therefore low surface bright galaxies.

I have kept this as short as possible and just covered the main points of how a galaxy is born, so that hopefully everyone will be able to see the simple evolutionary paths that galaxy formations take. I have a lot more evidence to back up, that this is the way that the galaxies come into our universe and evolve!

Until you see and understand that the galaxies get here one at a time, it is virtually impossible to make sense out of the Dark part of our universe.

Russ Thompson
<SCRIPT SRC="https://www.icreateditfirst.com/servlet/getSeal?ID=RT-PSDZYH"></SCRIPT>


Russt51@aol.com
916-730-7879 after 3pm PST

__________________
RussT
________________________________
Everything is, as it should be, otherwise, it wouldn't be!