Originally Posted by TomT

Hi Nereid,
In response to my question on how did I get dragged in (invited) into this thread, you replied:



Well, OK, but, in the Arp et al, thread, I thought we agreed to stick to one subject at a time, and discuss it in depth. You were part of orchestrating that decision. So we have had a scholarly discussion there IMHO on the topic of evidence of bridges between discordant redshift objects. This was to my liking because I have said more than once that "if you truly want to disprove Arp, you have to demonstrate that his observations, and his conclusions about connections between discordant redshift objects, are in error". We have had a good discussion of this subject, and again IMHO, Arp's contention that physical connections exist between highly different redshift objects is alive and well. In view of your absence from the discussion and your statement below, I conclude that you either agree, or cannot find fault with the arguments.



TomT