Squirm: Are you under of the influence? You sound like it!

No, I am not. I make my decision after I have read your hypothesis and Jay's.

I take it you missed that bit, then?

I have not missed anything. You have misrepresented my points.

You're cracking me up.

Then I suggest you look over your hypothesis, and compare it with Percy's.

Now please tell me, where am I doing any of that?

You name it. Have you put much thought into your posts?

I am sorry if I gave you the impression that I was going to present the smoking gun which would prove once and for all that the moon landings were fake.

You have not proven anything. You're back to the same old trick of speculative conejecture. Jay has already give detailed points on why the whistle-blower theory fails and yours.

For heavens sake, not only have I acknowledged Percy's argument but I have clearly stated that I want nothing to do with it. How much clearer can I make that?

Then why does you arguments have a striking resemblance to Percy's?

Admit it. You're intoxicated. Aren't you.

No, I am not. I have never touched alcohol before, and I'll never will. You're being downright insulting, and I must remind you that this is a great way to get banned from this forum.

__________________
~AstroMike