Re: Critiques of Presentation of Uniform Expansion Theory
There's another problem here. Since it's a course for college credit, I would imagine it's graded. And that you (SFU) would be doing the grading. That fact alone disqualifies the class members as objective reviewers. Whether unconsciously or not, the class members will consider the instructor to be the gateway to a passing grade high enough to get the college credit, and thus do what they think the instructor wants them to. For high school students in a college environment this tendency would be even more pronounced.
This isn't idle speculation. While in high school I took a number of college credit courses in such things as molecular biology, physics, astronomy, etc. We essentially took as fact whatever the instructors told us. After all, we were just high school students.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
|