View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-June-2006, 05:57 AM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Critiques of Presentation of Uniform Expansion Theory

Re:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial Mechanic
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov
There's another problem here. Since it's a course for college credit, I would imagine it's graded. And that you (SFU) would be doing the grading.
I'm not sure that snowflakeuniverse is actually teaching the course. In the OP he wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowflakeuniverse
Every couple of years I have the opportunity to present my Uniform Expansion Theory to a group of Advance Placement High school physics students, many of who will receive college credit for the course.
It's probably a case of the teacher saying "And now for something completely different" and turning the floor over to Mr. Kulick for one session.
However he later writes

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowflakeuniverse
In the interest of truth, I thought that this year I would also post on this forum what I taught, thereby allowing a more diverse critique of the model. If I was teaching something wrong, someone within this forum could show the error. (Someday, someone with authority, and more importantly, someone with courage, will acknowledge that what I am teaching is right, and it is the presently taught model that is wrong, but at this site I know I can depend upon critiques).
in which he uses "taught" and "teaching" twice. Then again perhaps he considers a one-session presentation to be teaching.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celestial Mechanic
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov
This isn't idle speculation. While in high school I took a number of college credit courses in such things as molecular biology, physics, astronomy, etc. We essentially took as fact whatever the instructors told us. After all, we were just high school students.
Very true, and the reason why snowflakeuniverse needs to present his ideas somewhat higher up the academic food-chain.
Agreed.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.