Squirm: I don't know how.

You have misrepresented my points because you think I have not read your hypothesis and I don't know what talking about.

I can't, that is why I am asking for direction.

Then perhaps we should go back to the top.

Assertion #1: I am arguing that 'Diamonds Are Forever' could contain a whistle-blow.

Assertion #2: It is my hypothesis that this scene is possibly a whistle-blow.

Assertion #3: I've gone on at length why it could be a whistle-blow.

Does this help?

Yes, I know that. I was being a little sarcastic.

Then why are you insulting me when have you admit that?

No, please forget Jay for one moment. If you are going to point fingers then it's quite improper to do so while hiding behind somebody else.

All right, I'll forget about Jay. But you're still pointing fingers at Diamonds to cover yourself. I'm not trying to hide behind somebody else on purpose.

If you reappraise my contribution you will find that there are major differences between what I believe and that which David Percy believes.

All right, your hypothesis is different than Percy's, but not that different. The foundation for it is basically the same layout as his.

Now, I challenge to go to bed tonight and not dream of David Percy!

I'm not trying accuse you of being obsessive with David Percy, but you seem intrigued by his theories.

Oh, lighten up, man.

No, you lighten up. You think I don't appreciate your hypothesis. Well, I don't, but I do not think it is a joke. You should put more thought into it, with a lot more originality.

__________________
~AstroMike