Quote:
|
Originally Posted by R.A.F.
Problem with your "analogy"...the red men didn't possess any technology, so they wouldn't "know it" if it bit them in the butt.
|
Are you saying that the many implements used for hunting, gathering, sewing, decorating etc
weren't technology?
I think blanket stock statements like "wouldn't know it if it bit them in the butt" is meaningless, considering the tech they DID have.
Quote:
Your "premise" also contains a fallacy. Just because advanced tech. "might" appear to be magical DOES NOT MEAN
that things that appear magical are automatically advanced tech. You can't assume it "works both ways' without some form of evidence.
|
But of course.
And then we find ourselves bickering over what evidence is.
After all, I accept the testimony of texts and witnesses throughout history as well as modern witnesses with radar-visual cases and the word of trained observers; aviators, police, military, scientists etc.
You do not.
Quote:
|
That's the 2nd time in the last few of your posts that you have "implied" that I am somehow closed-minded simply because I don't agree with what you have to say. I suggest that you STOP IT unless you can demonstrate that to be true.
|
No, RAF, I haven't "implied" anything.
Reviewing 3 years of such exchanges as this between us will certainly show how nothing I say will be convincing enough for you.
I realize that nothing short of the craft landing on your head will be convincing to you.
So in the end, I'm a "woowoo" in your opinion, and you are, IMO, a pseudoskeptic.
That's OK, as long as we can have a few laughs along the way, right?
Certainly.
Do you?