Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RussT
I will readily admit that I do not have all the answers to some of these things.
Like Bob Angrstom said in Nereids thread, most of the time when new theories come to light, much of the details have not been fleshed out yet. They have never been studied in that way yet!
The only ones we have ever studied have plenty of 'star stuff' falling onto the accretion discs for us to be able to see and detect them. In fact, that is the only way we can know there is a black hole there, is to 'see' the brightness of the Matter in the case of optical sighting, or for it to be energetic enough, as in the case of the jets, with an X-ray sighting.
The other thing is, I have now idea how long this particular Dark Matter Galaxy has been in existence, so if it has only been gathering the Gamma radiation that become the Hydrogen I for say 50 to 1000 years then it would probably be much harder to detect the black hole than if it has been say 300 thousand years and star formation is emminent. But even then, how long will it take to make enough stars to be able to optically see this galaxy, based on the distance they are from us? And can we even detect the black hole before this happens? These are certainly questions that will need to be answered.
|
Let's consider this alongside
the OP; in all cases the
bolding is mine.
"
Keep in mind here, that all the math has already been done, in all the modeling of the different parts of what I am going to show. All I am doing, is showing how the different parts of the puzzle fit together, to form a coherent picture of precisely what is happening to cause the Birth Of a Galaxy"
Question: where can one find "all the math" (that has already been done)?
Question: how are we to interpret "precisely", if there is nothing quantitative presented?
"
It is now well established that a Super Massive Black Hole (SMBH) exists in the center of all regular galaxies, and that these SMBH’s are rotating, so would therefore be Kerr Rotating Black Holes, which would then mean that they would have “Ring” shaped singularities somewhere in the depths of the black hole."
Question: where is the material which shows the "all"?
Question: where is the material which shows that (all) the SMBHs are rotating?
Question: as no one has ever 'seen' inside the event horizon of any black hole (SMBH or otherwise), how do you know,
RussT, that there is a singularity (whether "Ring" or not) "somewhere in the depths"?
"
The “First Dark Matter Galaxy Found” is a galaxy of Hydrogen I spinning just like a galaxy is supposed to because of the black hole at it’s center, and this stays dark (comparable to the dark era) for somewhere around 3 to 5 hundred thousand years or longer, before the black hole has gathered it back enough to start the star making process."
Question: how are we to interpret "just like", if there is nothing quantitative presented?
Question: where are the materials showing the "supposed to" relationship between "a galaxy of Hydrogen I spinning" and "the black hole at it’s center"?
Question: what is the mechanism that makes such a new galaxy "stay dark"?
(to be continued)