So it all comes down to pictures of dead bodies? You are sick. You think they would put that on the internet for you to ogle? Maybe in USAToday? It's nooz, right? Here's a clue, there are no posted photos of dead people because it's not news because most people believe that an airplane crashed into the pentagon and it doesn't need to be shown. It's also sick to even want to see it. Most people don't need to have it proven that fire is hot. You are are in the minority. Mouthy but minority nevertheless. You are a nut.

Of course, you completely miss the point. I was citing examples of inconsistent reports, including the fuselage, passengers, and rows of seats. You pick passengers out of it all to start a misguided tirade, complete with forum-disallowed ad hominems.

Also what is this then???????

Good question - what is it?

Inconsistancies mean nothing without an alternative solution. Your sick ravings also mean nothing.

More nonsense. I was asked to show inconsistencies in the reports, which I did.

I read a book once. It had pictures of dead passengers. One even still in his seat, if I recall. One was dead laying on somebody's porch. Does that give you a warm tingly? Hit your local library, maybe you can find it.

Ban me, I've had enough. What an idiot.

That just about sums it up perfectly.