Let me see if I have this correct. For the official story we have,

A bunch of people saying a plane hit the Pentagon.

Most of which did not say they actually saw a plane hit the Pentagon. If you look at the accounts, the vast majority saw a plane nearby, but did not see an actual impact.

There's a hole in the Pentagon the size of a plane.

The holes in the towers were each the size of a plane, specifically conforming to the size and shape of a 756 or 767. The Pentagon had one round hole, which could be caused by any number of objects.

There are plane parts all over the crash area.

"All over"? Some first hand witnesses saw absolutely no aircraft debris at the site. And none of the debris has been conclusively shown to have come from a 757, nor specifically Flt. 77.

AA77 is missing.

I agree with this point. It still hasn't been found. But of course, the only place they looked for it was at the Pentagon!

But taking it as you actually meant it - the absence of the aircraft cannot be taken as valid evidence it therefore must have hit the Pentagon.

There is a plane load of missing passengers.

Same as the previous.

Poor quality videos shows an object traveling at airplane speeds.

Which is also not valid evidence on which to base the claim of Flt. 77 hitting the Pentagon.

Cars in Pentagon parking lot damaged by something flying over head.

Again, a point which does not provide evidence for Flt. 77.

WTC attacked with planes.

Completely irrelevant. Two planes hitting other buildings in a different city does not prove another plane therefore must have hit another building.

Low flying plane reported over DC

Which again is not evidence for the claim that Flt. 77 hit the Pentagon.

For the CTs we have,

Conflicting eyewitness statements, but not about the plane, just the fine details.

No, the conflicting statements include the plane (or lack thereof).

Poor quality videos shows an object traveling at airplane speeds, but object can't clearly be IDed as a plane.

The object can't be ID'ed as a plane, period.

Government not releasing all the evidence when the CTs want it.

No. Government not releasing any concrete evidence. When everybody should require it.

No pictures available of dead bodies or body parts

Or pictures of the plane hitting the building. Or pictures of clearly identifiable 757 parts. Or pictures of anything that proves the Gov't claim.

By a preponderance of the evidence, it was a plane. No evidence for anything else.

What preponderance of evidence? There is clearly a burden of proof for the Government claim that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. They have absolutely failed to prove that claim.