Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Grey
This is a pretty fascinating claim, because I see the evidence for the big bang as having many effects on other theories. For example, what about redshifts? If redshifts are in fact a measure of recession, then we have solid evidence that galaxies are getting further apart, i.e., the universe is expanding. But if the redshifts we observe have some other source, that means that all our measurements of velocity in the universe are suspect, which has a pretty dramatic effect on all kinds of astrophysical theories. Which is it?
|
Interpretation of the redshift in BBT led to some extraordinary properties of the quasars (energy output) which in turn led to model of the AGN as
a supermassive black hole in the center of a galaxy.
And just there I will point to an alternative astrophysics theory with a good theoretical foundation:
What in mainstream astrophysics is Black Hole in some scientists view is
MECO object, inferred from solutions to GR equations, found in 2003.
here
here
here
proponents : Abhaz Mitra, Stanley Robertson
p.s. and I think it's very good