How good is the expanding universe cosmology, in its own terms?
We have seen that alternative ATM theories can both predict a redshift and also calculate the expected value of the Hubble constant with ease. Ari Brinjolfsson (arXiv:astro-ph/0401420v2) and
some guy called Ashmore do it with ease.
The topic of this thread is to ask how well mainstream cosmology ie BB and the expanding universe can do it.
i.e. how does the BB predict the value of H and how does this predicted value agree with the observed one?
Cheers
Lyndon