Quote:
|
Originally Posted by antoniseb
Look Lyndon, I read your theory and there is a very random choice of units that makes for a happy coincidence for your numbers. You yourself say that there is no physical reason but guessing that there should be such a match up. I don't think your theory "predicts" the Hubble constant anymore than me saying I graduated in '73, so it must be 73 kilometers/sec per megaparsec predicts it.
|
Once again, this is off topic, the thrust of this thread is how the BB predicts a value of the Hubble constant and how well this predicted value compares with the observed value. Surely that is not asking too much.
However, on a point of information my theory predicts H = 2nhr/m (h planck constant, m and r mass and classical radius of the electron. 'n' is the average electron density of IG space and published values of this lie between 0.1 and 10 electrons per cubic metre of space.
H = 72km/s per Mpc is when n = 0.5! Theory is consistent with observation, no coincidences, referenced material, accepted physics.
Now, can we get baock to the OT - what is the BB prediction?
Cheers,
Lyndon.
P.S. I think you are confusing Ashmore's paradox (H = hr/m per cubic metre of space) with Ashmore's theory - a very different thing altogether.