Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nereid
( reference):1) To what extent is the "Ashmore idea" in -b> consistent with the many high-z supernovae observations?
2) What are the sources for the value(s) of n (the 'average' density of electrons in 'intergalactic space') in -a>?
3) What kind of 'average' does the method -a> use (or require)?
4) Which regions of 'intergalactic space' do the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of observations of (galaxy) redshifts include?
5) Which regions of 'intergalactic space' are excluded?
6) Which galaxies have been observed to have an H 0 in the region [12, 50] km/s per Mpc?
7) Which galaxies have been observed to have an H 0 in the region [120, 1200] km/s per Mpc? |
Are you trying to hijack my thread Nereid?
This is totally OT. If you would like to discuss these matters then please start your own thread. You see, you might find this hard to believe but some posters pose questions asking how this , that or other ATM theory explains observations but when we point out that the BB can't do it we are told that it is OT.
So this thread is asking how the BB predicts a value for H and how close that predicted value is to the observed one.
So far it appears that the BB fails miserably.
Cheers,
Lyndon.
P.S. is you care to start a thread somewhere else I will happily join you for ten days - as after that I am going on my hols, Amsterdam, London, Paris,.... Ah!!!!