View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 19-June-2006, 08:19 PM
lyndonashmore lyndonashmore is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gulf
Posts: 1,275
Default

Quote:
Are you opening up this debate to include what the qualities are for theories that are "much of a theory"?
no I am into real science were predictions match observations.
Quote:
The context is that it is observed
sorry this is incorrect - what is observed is redshift. Expansion is an interpretation put onto the redshift. Other theories explain it differently. What is observed is redshift not velocity or expansion.
Quote:
You bring up the added acceleration, which is in some of these models attributed to Dark Energy. No one knows for certain what Dark Energy is,
Exactly. It is a crystal sphere to make the theory work.
13.7 billon years ago?
Didn't I show that the hubble age of the universe was m/hr for the electron in each cubic metre of space?
Cheers.
Lyndon.
P.S. Watch your spelling otherwise you will have Tim Thompson after you like he is after me!