Quote:
|
1. How can you say that the Expanding Universe Cosmology is "not much of a theory" unless you are inviting comparisons to other theories or opening this discussion as to what would constitute "much of a theory".
|
I say that the BB is not much of a theory because it cannot predict the most important bit of the jigsaw i.e. The Hubble constant.
Quote:
|
The Redshift-distance relationship is observed. This is what H is a measure of. H is described in terms of velocity per distance, because redshift is nornally thought of as equivelant to velocity.
|
No way Hosay! H is not described in terms of velocity per distance unless yo are a follower of the Bb. What is observed is a shift in wavelength. The rest is in the interpretation of that result. Since when did scientists believe things to be true because
Quote:
|
normally thought of as equivelant
|
get real. In Hubble's own words
"What we measure is redshift and that is what we will call them.
NOT VELOCITY
Cheers,
Lyndon